Arguing our points

Just sitting here browsing, since my patients have chosen not to show up this morning – so far.  David Brazzeal at www.curieux.ca posted a link to this article, Avoiding the Argument Party, on the Resonate group conversation.  Brian McLaren gets knocked around for his expressions of belief but I sure think he writes with a lot of insight.  We spend a lot of time defending ourselves and specific current issues that we have strong opinions on.  We like to argue, especially if we can make our point clear. 

But, I wonder if Jesus would have argued over the popular controversies or if he would have left them to the religious leaders who liked to argue? 

Comments Off on Arguing our points

Filed under Books and Articles

0 responses to “Arguing our points

  1. well the gospels give me the impression Jesus was not against the occasional debate or verbal confrontation. however, he seems to have chosen them a lot more carefully than many church leaders seem to now.

  2. Phil

    Good article. I would add that I see a difference between argument, debate, and dialogue. The goal of argument and debate is to win, which requires a loser. Dialogue, on the other hand, seeks common understanding. I feel strongly that there are important issues that the church should discuss, but perhaps it should be done using dialogue, with a spirit of humility, rather than argument or debate. Even when appealing to scripture (“where is it written”) we should admit that our interpretation of God’s word could be wrong.